ChatGPT does not speak, you decide if it helps or hinders
The Emergence of Tools such as ChatGPT in the Digital Landscape
The arrival of tools like ChatGPT has sparked both fascination and skepticism in equal measure. While some celebrate its efficiency, others are determined to put it to the test. However, the key does not lie in the tool itself, but rather in how we choose to use it. This approach can either turn it into a brilliant ally or an annoying noise. Which path will you choose? More than just a tool: a mirror of our attitude.
The Reflective Nature of Generative AI
Generative AI does not have its own personality, but rather reflects that of its user. Some approach it with a competitive spirit: asking tricky questions, searching for errors, and celebrating failures as personal victories. In this game of “who knows more,” the outcome is predictable: an unproductive conversation with vague or failed responses.
Reflection on ChatGPT’s Impact
As we navigate the landscape of AI tools like ChatGPT, it is essential to consider not only their capabilities but also our approach to using them. Whether they become valuable allies or sources of frustration depends on the mindset and intentions we bring to the table. Ultimately, the choice is ours: to harness the power of these tools for productive collaboration or to allow them to become obstacles in our digital interactions.
Others, on the other hand, use it as if it were an applied intern. They give clear tasks, review their results, correct if necessary. In this type of relationship, AI becomes an effective resource that executes quickly and allows to go further.
### Leading is also knowing when to let go
The secret lies in adopting the role of a responsible leader: someone who knows how to delegate, but also supervise and take final responsibility. It’s not about letting AI do everything, but integrating it intelligently. Sometimes it can start a task, other times complete it. But it is always necessary to know when to intervene and say: “thank you, now let me finish it.”
This attitude, closer to structured leadership than to participative coaching, allows for multiplying results without losing control or quality. Today’s digital leader is not someone who knows it all but rather someone who knows how to coordinate different intelligences.
A new team, with members who do not complain
AI does not feel offended if you use it only for certain tasks. You can bring in ChatGPT to generate the structure of a text and then let another AI, like Claude, perfect it. None of them will take offense if they enter or leave the process.
This flexibility is an enormous competitive advantage, provided we know which tool to use depending on the objective: DALL·E or Midjourney for images, Gamma for presentations, ChatGPT for ideas or writing, etc. Thus, the user becomes a true manager of intelligences, capable of building teams according to specific needs.
The new digital literacy: managing intelligences
The real change is not in the technology, but in our way of interacting with it. It is no longer enough to know how to use tools: we must understand their logic, their limits and possibilities. The education of the future, both in universities and in businesses, should focus on training managers of artificial intelligence, not just simple consumers of gadgets.
The Attitudinal Difference Between an Immature and an Effective User
The difference between an immature and an effective user is not technical, but attitudinal. Those who try to “trick” the AI lose their potential. Those who know when to use it and when not to, turn it into an extension of their professional capacity. Because in the end, like every brilliant intern, the AI needs direction. And that role, for now, remains human.
