Tasks and behaviors linked to lower intelligence in individuals, as per Google’s AI
AI has become an everyday tool that supports multiple aspects of our daily lives, from simplifying tasks to collecting and analyzing data. In this context, Google’s AI has conducted an analysis on the jobs and expressions that are most commonly selected or used by people with lower cognitive abilities. This recent study reveals details about patterns of job choice and language, reflecting how intelligence and environment shape individuals’ choices.
The choice of a career or job largely depends on personal factors such as preferences, previous experience, and educational level. However, job opportunities do not always align with what each person would like to do, and some are directed towards jobs that they do not find completely satisfying. According to Google’s AI analysis, people with lower cognitive abilities tend to lean towards jobs that are structured and involve repetitive tasks. Among these jobs, factory production line work and customer service positions stand out. The common characteristic in these areas, according to Google’s study, is that they require a lower degree of complex decision-making, which can be an advantage for those who prefer work environments with less pressure in that aspect. However, this does not mean that those who perform these roles lack skills or talents. In fact, they often excel in areas such as teamwork and the ability to remain firm under pressure.
Common expressions associated with lower levels of knowledge
In addition to the workplace, Google’s AI identified a set of expressions that seem to be more present in the vocabulary of people with lower levels of knowledge or deep analytical ability. These words or phrases tend to be used to communicate ideas in a simplified manner, without going into details or delving into concepts. Among these expressions are:
– Basically
– Like
– Obvious
– Simply
– Great
The frequency of use of these words does not necessarily indicate a person’s intelligence, but rather their communication style. Google’s AI suggests that these expressions could be a reflection of how some people approach communication: directly and simply, without delving into complex explanations. However, the use of accessible language is not directly related to intellectual level, but may reflect a preference or style of interaction.
What does this study tell us about choices and communication?
This analysis from AI provides a perspective on how job preferences and language can be influenced by factors such as cognitive abilities and social context. While it is important to remember that these results are not intended to label people or reduce their value to their choice of words or type of work, the study opens up a dialogue about how these factors relate in everyday life. This approach helps us better understand the various ways in which people interact and develop in work and social environments, showing that the value of a worker or person goes far beyond labels.
